You’re missing out on a lot by sticking with your historical financial management solution instead of bridging the gap with a modernized consolidation solution. Let’s get you up to speed.
FinanceFebruary 17, 2020
Historical financial management vs. CCH Tagetik: a feature-by-feature comparison for power users
As a day-to-day user of financial management systems, you’re likely sensitive to the shortcomings of the applications you use. Do any of these pains apply to you?
Common complaints include:
- Complex scripting for even basic tasks
- Lengthy variance and what-if analysis processes
- Lack of workflow across the close cycle
- Outdated UI and cumbersome integration with Microsoft Office
- Complex upgrades with no functional innovations planned
Related Insights
-
ArticleFinanceApril 08, 2024Navigating the EPM labyrinth: A guide for modern finance leaders - by FutureCFO EditorsIn this article written by the DigitalCFO, Chee Kien Loh, ASEAN regional business manager for CCH Tagetik at Wolters Kluwer, sheds light on the critical role of EPM in modern finance.
-
Case studyFinanceMarch 11, 2024Profit and Loss Management with CCH® Tagetik - Toyota Finance Corporation's case studyToyota Finance Corporation uses CCH® Tagetik for Corporate Performance Management, Budgeting and Planning, and Profit and Loss Management.
-
WebinarFinanceJanuary 10, 2024Case Study: The building blocks of financial transformation in 2024In this on-demand webinar hear from our partner, MeltOne, a large US manufacturer, as they explore the building blocks of successful financial transformation.
-
ArticleESGFinanceOctober 30, 2023Road to Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD)Read this blog to learn why getting this technological foundation in place now should be a top priority in corporate management.
